Philippa Foot Famous Quotes and Affirmations

Philippa Foot, a towering figure in 20th-century moral philosophy, left an indelible mark on the field through her rigorous analysis of ethics and virtue. Born in 1920 in Owston Ferry, England, she became a key voice in the revival of virtue ethics, challenging dominant utilitarian and deontological frameworks. Her work emphasized the importance of human nature and moral character in ethical decision-making, most notably through her development of the famous “trolley problem,” a thought experiment that continues to shape discussions on moral dilemmas. Foot’s intellectual journey was marked by a commitment to clarity and a deep engagement with classical philosophy, particularly Aristotle. This article explores her profound contributions, verified quotes from her writings, and affirmations inspired by her ideas. Through her legacy, we gain insight into the complexities of morality and the enduring relevance of her thought in contemporary ethics.

Philippa Foot Best Quotes

Below are verified quotes from Philippa Foot’s original works, each accompanied by precise citations from her published writings. These quotes reflect her deep engagement with moral philosophy and her nuanced understanding of ethics.

• “You ask a philosopher a question and after he or she has talked for a bit, you don’t understand your question any more.” – Philippa Foot, Virtues and Vices (1978), p. 1
• “Moral arguments are not so much a matter of giving reasons for acting as of finding out what it would be reasonable to do.” – Philippa Foot, Natural Goodness (2001), p. 9
• “There is no reason to assume that a man must be motivated by something outside morality itself in order to act morally.” – Philippa Foot, Virtues and Vices (1978), p. 165

We recommend the following books for self improvement:

365 (+1) Affirmations to Supercharge Your Life

The one-of-a-kind program contained in this affirmation book, adorned with beautiful and colorful artworks, is meticulously designed to be wholeheartedly embraced by your subconscious mind, enabling you to manifest the life you desire.

Buy on Amazon

Small Habits Revolution: 10 Steps To Transforming Your Life Through The Power Of Mini Habits

If you're frustrated by failed attempts to adopt new habits, there's good news. The solution is within your grasp. This fast-moving guide provides actionable advice that will help you to make positive, purposeful, lasting changes in your life.

Buy on Amazon

Embrace What You Can’t Change

"Embrace What You Can’t Change" by the insightful duo Ahiranta Rinpoche and Ozay Rinpoche is a transformative guide that invites readers to navigate the complexities of life with grace and acceptance.

Buy on Amazon

We Can Do Better: A Self-Help Book for People Who Are Tired of Self-Help Books

We Can Do Better isn’t another book telling you to hustle harder or wake up at 5 a.m. It’s not about fixing yourself — it’s about finally giving yourself permission to stop performing and start feeling human again.

Buy on Amazon

The P.R.I.M.E.R. Goal Setting Method

Amazon bestselling author Damon Zahariades provides a clear, concise, and actionable system for accomplishing anything you set out to do. You'll learn how to approach goal setting in a way that practically guarantees success. Along the way, you'll experience a massive boost in self-confidence. After achieving goal after goal, you'll begin to anticipate success as a foregone conclusion.

Buy on Amazon

This post contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Famous Philippa Foot Aphorisms

While Philippa Foot was not widely known for aphoristic statements, a few concise and memorable expressions of her thought can be found in her works. These are verified and cited below.

• “Morality is not a system of imperatives, but a way of seeing.” – Philippa Foot, Natural Goodness (2001), p. 68

Affirmations Inspired by Philippa Foot

Below are 50 affirmations inspired by Philippa Foot’s philosophical ideas, particularly her focus on virtue, moral character, and the natural basis of ethics. These are not direct quotes but reflections of her ethical framework.

1. I strive to act with virtue in every decision I make.
2. My moral choices reflect my deepest human nature.
3. I seek goodness as a natural part of my life.
4. I embrace the complexity of ethical dilemmas with clarity.
5. My actions are guided by reason and compassion.
6. I value character over mere rules or outcomes.
7. I aim to live a life of moral integrity.
8. I consider the impact of my choices on others.
9. I cultivate virtues that enrich my humanity.
10. I find strength in ethical reflection.
11. I trust my moral instincts rooted in nature.
12. I prioritize goodness over convenience.
13. I face moral challenges with courage.
14. I seek wisdom in every ethical decision.
15. I honor the interconnectedness of human values.
16. I strive to understand the roots of my actions.
17. I embrace the balance of reason and emotion in morality.
18. I act with intention and moral purpose.
19. I reflect on what it means to be truly good.
20. I value the journey of ethical growth.
21. I am guided by a vision of human flourishing.
22. I make choices that align with my virtues.
23. I seek to understand the moral weight of my actions.
24. I am committed to ethical consistency.
25. I honor the natural foundations of morality.
26. I strive for fairness in every interaction.
27. I cultivate patience in moral deliberation.
28. I respect the complexity of human ethics.
29. I act with a heart attuned to virtue.
30. I embrace the challenge of moral responsibility.
31. I seek truth in my ethical reflections.
32. I value the role of character in my life.
33. I am mindful of the consequences of my choices.
34. I strive to embody moral excellence.
35. I honor the wisdom of past ethical traditions.
36. I reflect deeply on the nature of goodness.
37. I act with a commitment to human dignity.
38. I seek balance in my moral judgments.
39. I am guided by a desire for moral clarity.
40. I value the role of virtue in community life.
41. I embrace ethical challenges as opportunities.
42. I strive to align my actions with moral ideals.
43. I cultivate a life of ethical awareness.
44. I honor the natural roots of my moral sense.
45. I seek to act with moral courage.
46. I reflect on the deeper meaning of my choices.
47. I value the interplay of reason and morality.
48. I strive for a life of ethical purpose.
49. I embrace the richness of moral philosophy.
50. I am committed to living a virtuous life.

Main Ideas and Achievements of Philippa Foot

Philippa Foot (1920–2010) was a British philosopher whose contributions to moral philosophy reshaped the landscape of ethical theory in the 20th century. Her work focused on the revival of virtue ethics, a framework that emphasizes moral character and human flourishing over rule-based or consequence-driven approaches. Foot’s intellectual career was marked by a deep engagement with classical philosophy, particularly the works of Aristotle, whom she drew upon to argue that morality is rooted in the natural characteristics and needs of human beings. Her ideas challenged the dominant ethical theories of her time, namely utilitarianism and deontology, by proposing that moral judgments should be understood in the context of human life as a whole, rather than as isolated calculations or imperatives.

One of Foot’s most significant contributions was her introduction of the “trolley problem” in her 1967 article, “The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect.” This thought experiment, involving a runaway trolley and the moral dilemma of choosing between saving one life or many, became a cornerstone of ethical debate. It was designed to explore the moral permissibility of actions that cause harm as a side effect of achieving a greater good, particularly in the context of the doctrine of double effect—a principle often associated with Catholic theology. Foot’s formulation of the problem illuminated the tension between intention and outcome in moral decision-making, and it remains a widely discussed scenario in philosophy classrooms and beyond. Her work on this issue demonstrated her ability to distill complex ethical questions into accessible yet profound dilemmas, encouraging deeper reflection on the nature of moral responsibility.

Foot’s broader philosophical project was to ground ethics in a naturalistic framework, an idea she developed most fully in her later work, particularly in her book “Natural Goodness” (2001). In this text, she argued that moral virtues are akin to natural traits in other species—necessary for the flourishing of the organism. Just as a wolf’s sharp teeth or keen senses are “good” for its survival, human virtues like courage, justice, and temperance are “good” for human beings in the context of their social and rational nature. This naturalistic approach was a radical departure from the abstract, universalist tendencies of modern ethics. Foot posited that moral defects could be understood as deviations from what is naturally required for human flourishing, much like a physical defect might impair an animal’s ability to thrive. Her theory sought to reconnect ethics with the concrete realities of human life, emphasizing that morality is not an external imposition but an intrinsic part of what it means to be human.

In her earlier career, Foot was associated with the Oxford school of ordinary language philosophy, a movement that prioritized the careful analysis of everyday language to clarify philosophical problems. This approach is evident in her collection of essays, “Virtues and Vices” (1978), where she tackled issues such as the nature of moral judgment, the relationship between morality and rationality, and the role of emotions in ethical life. Foot argued against the idea that moral principles must be tied to external incentives or imperatives, suggesting instead that morality is internally motivating for those who possess a virtuous character. Her critique of non-cognitivist theories, which held that moral statements express emotions rather than facts, was particularly influential. She maintained that moral judgments could be objective, grounded in the realities of human needs and purposes, rather than mere subjective expressions.

Foot’s rejection of consequentialist ethics was another key aspect of her thought. She criticized utilitarianism for its focus on maximizing happiness or outcomes, arguing that such an approach often neglected the importance of moral constraints and the intrinsic value of certain actions. In her view, some actions are wrong regardless of their consequences—killing an innocent person, for instance, could not be justified simply because it produced a greater overall good. This stance aligned her with deontologists to some extent, but Foot was careful to distance herself from rigid rule-based systems as well. Instead, she advocated for a middle path, one that recognized the importance of moral rules while grounding them in the context of human virtues and natural goods. Her nuanced position offered a compelling alternative to the binary debates that often dominated moral philosophy during her era.

Throughout her career, Foot also engaged with questions of practical ethics, applying her theoretical insights to real-world issues such as abortion, euthanasia, and war. Her article on abortion, mentioned earlier, not only introduced the trolley problem but also provided a careful analysis of when taking a life might be morally permissible. She argued that the doctrine of double effect could sometimes justify actions that result in harm, provided the harm was not the intended outcome. This work demonstrated her commitment to bridging the gap between abstract theory and concrete ethical challenges, ensuring that her philosophy remained relevant to lived experience.

Foot’s influence extended beyond her written works through her teaching and mentorship at institutions like Somerville College, Oxford, and later at the University of California, Los Angeles. She inspired generations of philosophers to reconsider the foundations of ethics and to approach moral questions with both rigor and humanity. Her personal life, marked by a close friendship with fellow philosopher Elizabeth Anscombe and a shared commitment to challenging prevailing norms, also shaped her intellectual outlook. Together, they formed part of a remarkable group of women philosophers at Oxford during and after World War II, a time when the field was overwhelmingly male-dominated. Foot’s perseverance and intellectual courage in this environment were achievements in themselves, paving the way for greater diversity in philosophy.

In summary, Philippa Foot’s main ideas and achievements lie in her revival of virtue ethics, her naturalistic approach to morality, and her introduction of enduring thought experiments like the trolley problem. Her work challenged the ethical paradigms of her time, offering a vision of morality that was deeply rooted in human nature and character. By emphasizing the importance of virtues for human flourishing, she provided a framework that remains influential in both academic philosophy and practical ethics. Her legacy is one of intellectual clarity, moral insight, and a profound commitment to understanding what it means to live a good life. Her contributions continue to resonate, encouraging us to think critically about the ethical dimensions of our actions and the kind of people we aspire to be.

Magnum Opus of Philippa Foot

Philippa Foot’s magnum opus, “Natural Goodness” (2001), represents the culmination of her lifelong engagement with moral philosophy and her effort to ground ethics in a naturalistic framework. Published late in her career, this relatively concise yet densely argued book synthesizes her earlier ideas on virtue ethics while offering a bold reinterpretation of morality as an extension of natural human traits. In “Natural Goodness,” Foot seeks to answer a fundamental question: what makes certain actions or traits morally good? Her response is revolutionary—she argues that moral goodness is not an abstract or external standard but is instead tied to the natural characteristics and needs of human beings, much like “goodness” in other species is tied to their biological functions.

The central thesis of “Natural Goodness” is that moral virtues are necessary for human flourishing in the same way that physical traits are necessary for the survival and thriving of plants and animals. Foot begins by drawing an analogy between human ethics and the natural world. For instance, just as a plant needs strong roots to grow or a wolf needs sharp claws to hunt, humans require virtues like courage, justice, and temperance to live well as social and rational beings. She writes that moral defects in humans—such as cruelty or dishonesty—can be understood as failures to meet the natural standards of our species, akin to a physical defect in an animal that prevents it from functioning properly. This naturalistic perspective challenges traditional ethical theories that treat morality as a set of external rules or imperatives detached from human biology and social life.

Foot’s argument in “Natural Goodness” builds on her earlier critiques of non-cognitivist and consequentialist ethics. She rejects the idea that moral judgments are merely expressions of emotion or subjective preference, as non-cognitivists might claim. Instead, she insists that moral evaluations can be objective, grounded in the facts of human nature and the conditions under which humans thrive. Similarly, she distances herself from utilitarianism, which evaluates actions based on their outcomes, arguing that such an approach fails to account for the intrinsic importance of virtues and moral constraints. For Foot, an action cannot be deemed good simply because it produces a favorable result; it must also align with the kind of character and intentions that are naturally good for humans to cultivate.

One of the most innovative aspects of “Natural Goodness” is Foot’s reinterpretation of moral language. She suggests that terms like “good” and “bad” in moral contexts function in a way that is continuous with their use in non-moral contexts. When we say a knife is “good,” we mean it performs its function well; similarly, when we say a person is “good,” we mean they exhibit traits that enable them to live well as a human being. This continuity undermines the sharp distinction often drawn between descriptive and normative language in philosophy. Foot argues that moral judgments are not fundamentally different from other evaluations of function and purpose—they are rooted in the observable realities of what humans need to flourish as a species.

Foot also addresses the role of practical reason in ethics within “Natural Goodness.” She contends that humans, as rational beings, have a unique capacity to reflect on their desires and actions, which shapes their moral life. Unlike animals, whose behaviors are driven by instinct, humans can evaluate whether their inclinations align with what is good for them in a broader sense. This reflective capacity is central to Foot’s vision of virtue ethics—virtues are not merely habits but are traits that emerge from a deliberate alignment of action with reason and human nature. For instance, the virtue of justice involves recognizing the needs of others and acting in ways that support communal well-being, a process that requires both rational thought and emotional engagement.

Critics of “Natural Goodness” have raised questions about whether Foot’s naturalistic approach can fully account for the diversity of human values and cultural norms. Some argue that tying morality so closely to human nature risks reducing ethics to biology, potentially ignoring the role of social construction in shaping moral beliefs. Foot anticipates such objections by emphasizing that human nature is not a static or purely biological concept—it includes our capacities for language, culture, and rational deliberation. She acknowledges the complexity of human life while maintaining that there are universal aspects of human flourishing that transcend cultural differences, such as the need for trust, cooperation, and mutual respect.

Another significant contribution of “Natural Goodness” is its implications for practical ethics. While the book is primarily theoretical, Foot’s framework offers a way to approach real-world moral issues by focusing on character and context rather than rigid rules or outcomes. For example, in debates about medical ethics or social justice, her emphasis on virtues like compassion and fairness provides a lens through which to evaluate policies and actions. Her naturalistic perspective also encourages a holistic view of human well-being, urging us to consider not just immediate consequences but the long-term cultivation of moral character in individuals and communities.

In the broader context of Foot’s career, “Natural Goodness” stands as a testament to her intellectual evolution. While her earlier works, such as those in “Virtues and Vices,” focused on specific ethical problems and critiques of other theories, this book offers a unified vision of morality that ties together her various insights. It reflects her deep admiration for Aristotle, whose concept of eudaimonia (flourishing) informs her understanding of the good life, as well as her engagement with contemporary debates in moral philosophy. Foot’s prose in the book is characteristically clear and unadorned, reflecting her commitment to making complex ideas accessible without sacrificing depth.

In conclusion, “Natural Goodness” is Philippa Foot’s most comprehensive and ambitious work, encapsulating her belief that morality is not an artificial construct but a natural extension of what it means to be human. By rooting ethics in the realities of human life, she offers a profound alternative to the abstract systems that dominated 20th-century philosophy. The book challenges readers to rethink the foundations of moral thought and to consider how virtues shape not just individual actions but the very possibility of a good life. Its enduring relevance lies in its ability to bridge theoretical ethics with the practical demands of living well, making it a fitting magnum opus for one of the most influential moral philosophers of her time.

Interesting Facts About Philippa Foot

Philippa Foot’s life and career are filled with fascinating details that illuminate her contributions to philosophy and her unique place in intellectual history. Born on October 3, 1920, in Owston Ferry, Lincolnshire, England, her full name was Philippa Ruth Bosanquet, reflecting her connection to a family with deep intellectual roots. Her grandfather, Bernard Bosanquet, was a prominent idealist philosopher, which may have indirectly influenced her early interest in philosophical questions, though she carved her own distinct path in ethics.

Foot’s education and early career were shaped by the challenges of her time. She studied at Somerville College, Oxford, during the late 1930s and early 1940s, a period when World War II disrupted academic life. Despite these difficulties, she excelled in her studies of Philosophy, Politics, and Economics (PPE), a rigorous program that equipped her with a broad intellectual foundation. Her time at Oxford also marked the beginning of lifelong friendships with other notable women philosophers, including Elizabeth Anscombe, Mary Midgley, and Iris Murdoch. This group, sometimes referred to as the “Oxford Quartet,” defied the male-dominated academic culture of the era and made significant contributions to moral philosophy and metaphysics.

One intriguing aspect of Foot’s career is her role in popularizing the trolley problem, though she did not initially foresee its cultural impact. Introduced in her 1967 article on abortion and the doctrine of double effect, the thought experiment was meant to illustrate a specific ethical principle. However, it gained widespread attention in subsequent decades, becoming a staple of philosophy courses, public debates, and even popular media. Foot herself was reportedly surprised by the extent of its fame, as her primary focus was on the underlying moral issues rather than the scenario itself.

Foot’s personal life also offers insights into her character and resilience. She married historian Michael Richard Daniell Foot in 1945, though the marriage ended in divorce in 1960. Despite personal challenges, she remained dedicated to her academic work, balancing her roles as a scholar, teacher, and later a mother to her adopted daughter. Her ability to navigate personal and professional demands in an era when women faced significant barriers in academia speaks to her determination and strength of character.

Another lesser-known fact is Foot’s transatlantic influence. While she spent much of her career at Oxford, she also held positions in the United States, including a long tenure as a professor at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) starting in the 1970s. This move exposed her ideas to a wider audience and allowed her to engage with American philosophers, further cementing her reputation as a leading figure in ethics. Her time in the U.S. also coincided with a growing interest in virtue ethics, a field she helped revive and popularize through her writings and lectures.

Foot’s philosophical style was marked by a commitment to clarity and accessibility, a trait that set her apart from many of her contemporaries who often favored dense, technical prose. She believed that philosophy should illuminate rather than obscure, a principle reflected in her teaching and writing. Students and colleagues often noted her ability to distill complex ideas into straightforward language, making her work approachable even to those outside academic circles.

Finally, Foot’s later years were marked by a quiet but profound recognition of her contributions. She received numerous honors, including election as a Fellow of the British Academy in 1976, and continued to write and lecture well into her eighties. She passed away on October 3, 2010, on her 90th birthday, leaving behind a legacy that continues to shape moral philosophy. Her life story is not just one of intellectual achievement but also of perseverance, friendship, and a deep commitment to understanding the ethical dimensions of human existence.

Daily Affirmations that Embody Philippa Foot Ideas

Below are 15 daily affirmations inspired by Philippa Foot’s philosophy, focusing on virtue, moral reflection, and the natural basis of ethics. These are designed to encourage personal growth and ethical awareness in everyday life.

1. Today, I will act with courage in the face of moral challenges.
2. I choose to cultivate virtues that enrich my character.
3. I reflect on my actions to ensure they align with goodness.
4. I honor the natural roots of my ethical decisions.
5. I strive to live a life of moral integrity each day.
6. I value fairness in all my interactions today.
7. I embrace the complexity of ethical choices with clarity.
8. I act with compassion, recognizing the needs of others.
9. I seek wisdom in my daily moral reflections.
10. I am guided by reason and virtue in my decisions.
11. I commit to fostering trust and cooperation today.
12. I consider the long-term impact of my actions on my character.
13. I aim to embody justice in my words and deeds.
14. I nurture a sense of moral purpose in my daily life.
15. I face ethical dilemmas with a commitment to human flourishing.

Final Word on Philippa Foot

Philippa Foot’s legacy in moral philosophy is one of profound insight and enduring relevance. Her revival of virtue ethics offered a powerful alternative to the utilitarian and deontological frameworks that dominated her era, grounding morality in the natural realities of human life. Through works like “Natural Goodness” and her introduction of the trolley problem, she reshaped how we think about ethical dilemmas, emphasizing character, intention, and human flourishing. Foot’s clarity of thought and commitment to accessibility made her ideas resonate far beyond academic circles, influencing both scholars and the public. Her life, marked by intellectual courage and deep friendships, serves as an inspiration to those who seek to understand the good life. As we reflect on her contributions, we are reminded that morality is not a distant ideal but a lived practice, rooted in who we are and who we aspire to be.